Darujte

Global map of selected POPs-contaminated sites

Illustrating legacy pollution and priority remediation needs

WhatsApp Image 2025 04 27 at 12.27.49

POPs – persistent organic pollutants

– are hazardous chemicals with distinctive and dangerous properties. They persist in the environment for a long time, can travel long distances through air or sea, and are ‘bioaccumulative’. This means they build up in living organisms, mainly in fatty tissue, with concentrations increasing up the food chain – peaking in top predators such as humans and polar bears. POPs are highly toxic, and levels found in some people and animals exceed those known to cause health and biological effects. Many act as endocrine disruptors (interfering with hormones), while others are carcinogenic, mutagenic (affecting DNA), or teratogenic (causing birth defects).
Some POPs are pesticides, others are industrial chemicals, and some are unintentionally produced during chemical or combustion processes. In all cases, they degrade very slowly and remain in the environment long after pollution sources cease. Because their use and production inevitably lead to environmental release, POPs pose serious, unavoidable risks to human health and ecosystems. It is therefore essential to ban or at least severely restrict their use and eliminate legacy stockpiles and residues. Identification of POPs contaminated sites is important to assess exposure risks but also to contribute to inventories of contaminated sites. Once developed, inventories can be converted to interactive maps and published online contributing to public right to know about POP risks in their region. More information about inventory development can be accessed in the BAT BEP guidance on POP contaminated sites [1].
Safer alternatives are widely available and significantly reduce risks to people and wildlife. There are also better options for technologies and practices, such as waste incineration, that unintentionally generate POPs [2].

The Stockholm Convention

The Stockholm Convention is a global, legally binding treaty that entered into force on 17 May 2004 and, as of 1 January 2025, includes 186 Parties. It aims to eliminate major POPs, including pesticides, industrial chemicals, and unintentionally produced substances such as polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans (known as 'dioxins') [3].
Unlike earlier treaties focused only on air emissions (e.g. the Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution Convention) or waste transport (Basel Convention), the Stockholm Convention addresses all major pathways by which POPs contaminate the environment, food chains, and human health.
This map highlights POP-contaminated sites, which are increasingly important as unremediated locations remain major sources of pollution. Although efforts were made to gather the most current information, the status of the sites presented on the map may have changed, and some of them may have already been remediated.
Article 6 of the Convention states: 'In order to ensure that stockpiles consisting of or containing chemicals listed' under the Convention 'are managed in a manner protective of human health and the environment, each Party shall:' among other actions, '(e) Endeavour to develop appropriate strategies for identifying sites contaminated by chemicals listed in Annex A, B or C; if remediation of those sites is undertaken, it shall be performed in an environmentally sound manner'.
To assist Parties, experts on best available techniques (BAT) and best environmental practices (BEP) have developed specialized guidance, incorporating comments from Parties, observers, and relevant stakeholders.

POPs-contaminated sites

Although the guidance document provides a more detailed definition and description of POPs-contaminated sites, we offer a brief summary here. A POPs-contaminated site is a location where persistent organic pollutants (POPs) are present at concentrations above natural background levels, posing or potentially posing a risk to human health and the environment. While there is no single global definition, most national frameworks classify a site as contaminated if pollution significantly harms people, ecosystems, water sources, or other receptors. The contamination may result from industrial activities, pesticide use, waste disposal, or other human actions leading to the accumulation of hazardous substances in soil, water, or air.
To determine if a site is contaminated with POPs, a site-specific assessment is necessary, involving the measurement of pollutant levels and evaluation of associated risks. Unlike general policy definitions, which provide broad criteria for contamination, assessing POPs contamination requires scientific data to establish whether the pollutants exceed safe thresholds and pose a threat to human health or the environment. Once a site has been investigated and confirmed as a POP contaminated site it can be added to a national inventory of sites. This allows a risk-based comparison between sites and allocation of scarce resources to cleaning up the highest risk sites first. An inventory can also be converted to an interactive map locating the sites and providing summary information on contamination. Examples include the EU hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) inventory [4], the PFAS data Hub map [5] and the Australian PFAS Chemicals Map [6]. In early 2023, The Forever Pollution Project [7] revealed nearly 23,000 PFAS-contaminated sites across Europe, highlighting the power of investigative journalism.
More information on how to develop POP contaminated sites inventories is available in the Stockholm Convention Guidance on best available techniques and best environmental practices for the management of sites contaminated with persistent organic pollutants [1].
This Global Map of Selected POPs-contaminated Sites is by no means intended to compete with the above-mentioned projects, nor does it aim to do so. However, it illustrates that sites contaminated with POPs can take many forms — from old, mostly abandoned chemical plants that used to produce pesticides or technical POPs and now represent vast areas polluted with these substances, to obsolete pesticide storage sites, and even small medical waste incinerators with piles of dioxin-contaminated ash. Contaminated sites can also include facilities tainted with PCBs found in paints, whose removal can result in serious pollution spreading along several kilometers of a river. This diversity is what the presented map aims to show.
To successfully identify and manage POPs-contaminated sites — especially given their wide range of forms — a global guidance document is essential.

Risk reduction: How to get rid of POPs in wastes generated by remediation of contaminated sites?

After identifying contaminated sites, the question arises: how to manage POPs in waste from remediation? The best approach is prevention—stopping POPs from entering the environment, mainly through waste. This can be achieved by banning the production and use of intentional POPs and choosing technologies that do not generate unintentional POPs-like dioxins or PCBs.
A key example of a POPs source is medical waste incineration, which can be avoided by:
a) using non-combustion technologies such as autoclaves, and
b) ensuring proper waste segregation in hospitals.
Alternative technologies and practices also exist for managing other types of waste that are often sent for incineration and co-processing (burning waste in cement kilns) which are both sources of unintentional POPs [2].
For existing POP-containing waste, various management strategies exist. The expert group working on BAT/BEP Guidelines reviewed the effectiveness of non-combustion technologies for POP destruction [8]. Some methods promise effective elimination while preventing new POP formation, as required by the Stockholm Convention. In contrast, incineration—whether in waste incinerators or cement kilns—produces new POPs like dioxins, which then accumulate in the resulting waste and risk further environmental release.

Abbreviations used in the text

2,4,5-T - 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid (pesticide)
AFFF - aqueous film-forming foam
BAT – best available techniques
BCD – base catalyzed decomposition (non-combustion remediation technology)
BEP – best environmental practices
BEQ – bioanalytical equivalent [193, 194]
BFRs – brominated flame retardants
DDD - dichlordiphenyldichlorethane
DDE – dichlordiphenyldichlorethene
DDT – dichlordiphenyltrichlorethane (pesticide)
deca-BDE – decabromodiphenyl ether
dl PCBs – dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls
DP – dechlorane plus
DR CALUX - dioxin-responsive chemical-activated luciferase gene expression
dw – dry weight
fw – fresh weight
GEF – Global Environemnt Facility
HCB – hexachlorbenzene (technical substance, pesticide, undesired product)
HCH – hexachlorcyclohexan (pesticide)
gamma HCH – gama isomer of hexachlorcyclohexan, usually called lindane (pesticide)
I-TEQ – international toxic equivalent
LOQ – level of quantification
lw – lipid weight
MRL – maximum residue level
OCPs – organochlorinated pesticides
PBDD/Fs – polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, shortly called „brominated dioxins“ (unintentionally produced POPs)
PBDEs – polybrominated diphenylethers (brominated flame retardants)
PCBs – polychlorinated biphenyls (technical substance)
PCDD – polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
PCDD/Fs – polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, shortly called „dioxins“ (unintentionally produced POPs)
PCP – pentachlorophenol (pesticide)
PeCB – pentachlorobenzene
PFAS – per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
PFBS – perfluorobutanesulfonic acid
PFCA – perfluorocarboxylic acids
PFDA – perfluorodecanoic acid
PFPHxA – perfluorohexanoic acid
PFHxS – perfluorohexanesulfonic acid
PFOA – perfluorooctanoic acid
PFOS – perfluorooctanesulfonic acidPOPs – persistent organic pollutants
PFPA – perfluoropentanoic acid
SCCPs – short-chain chlorinated paraffins
TEQ – toxic equivalent
UNEP – United Nations Envronment Programme
UNIDO - United Nations Industrial Development Organization
USAID - United States Agency for International Development
WHO-TEQ – toxic equivalent according to the document of the World Health Organization [3].
ww – wet weight
 

References

1.         UNEP and BAT/BEP Expert Group, Guidance on best available techniques and best environmental practices for the management of sites contaminated with persistent organic pollutants. 2025.
2.         Jelinek, N., et al., Waste Incineration and the Environment. 2024, Prague - Perth - Yaounde - Gothenburg: Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme, Toxics Free Australia (TFA), Centre de Recherche et d‘Education pour le Développement (CREPD), International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN). 296.
3.         van den Berg, M., et al., The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol Sci, 2006. 93(2): p. 223-41.
4.         Commission, E. Inventory of sites potentially impacted by hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) now available online. 2023 2023/09/01 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/inventory-sites-potentially-impacted-hexachlorocyclohexane-hch-now-available-online-2023-09-01_en.
5.         CNRS. PFAS Data Hub. 2025 2025/02/19 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://pdh.cnrs.fr/en/map/.
6.         FOE Australia. Australian PFAS Chemicals Map. 2025 2025 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://pfas.australianmap.net/.
7.         The Forever Pollution Project. The Forever Pollution Map. 2023 2025/01 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://foreverpollution.eu/map/.
8.         UNEP - EG BAT/BEP, Annex II: Response to the request by the Conference of the Parties to the Basel Convention at its seventh meeting. Report of the second meeting of the Expert Group on Best Available Techniques and Best Environmental Practices. 2006: Geneva.
9.         Bassi, M. NASA Radar Detects Abandoned Site of Secret Cold War Project in Greenland—a ‘City Under the Ice’. 2024 04/12/2024 [cited 2025 07/03/2025]; Available from: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/nasa-radar-detects-abandoned-site-of-secret-cold-war-project-in-greenland-a-city-under-the-ice-180985550/.
10.       Poland, J.S., S. Mitchell, and A. Rutter, Remediation of former military bases in the Canadian Arctic. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2001. 32(2): p. 93-105.
11.       Colgan, W., et al., The abandoned ice sheet base at Camp Century, Greenland, in a warming climate. Geophysical Research Letters, 2016. 43(15): p. 8091-8096.
12.       Wikipedia. Sydney Tar Ponds. 2017 2025/02/02 [cited 2025 2025/03/26]; Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney_Tar_Ponds.
13.       Altra Sanexen, PFAS Challenges and Made-in-Canada Solutions for Water. Brief to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development. 2023: Montreal. p. 10.
14.       Henton, D. Environmentalists, First Nations oppose licence to keep Swan Hills waste facility operating. 2015 2015-Aug-01 [cited 2023 2023-12-10]; Available from: https://calgaryherald.com/news/politics/environmentalists-first-nations-oppose-licence-to-keep-swan-hills-waste-facility-operating.
15.       Froese, R. Closure of Swan Hills plant a big tax hit for the region. 2021 2021-Nov-19 [cited 2024 2024-Feb-11]; Available from: https://www.lakesideleader.com/closure-of-swan-hills-plan-a-big-tax-hit-for-the-region/.
16.       Guidotti, T.L., Evaluating Risk After a Hazardous Waste Treatment Plant Released Persistent Organic Pollutants. Part 2. Ecotoxicology and Human Health Risk. Case Studies in the Environment, 2018. 2(1): p. 1-13.
17.       Blais, J.M., et al., Assessment of PCBs in snow and lake sediments following a major release from the Alberta special waste treatment centre near Swan Hils, Alberta, Canada. Organohalogen Compounds, 1998. 39: p. 189-192.
18.       Blais, J.M., et al., Assessment and characterization of polychlorinated biphenyls near a hazardous waste incinerator: Analysis of vegetation, snow, and sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2003. 22(1): p. 126-133.
19.       Gabos, S., et al. Levels of PCBs, PCDDs and PCDFs in Fish in Alberta, Canada Following Accidental Release from a SHSWTC. in Organohalogen Compounds. 1998.
20.       Gabos, S., W. Zhang, and D. Kinniburgh, Long-term monitoring results of PCBS and PCDD/Fs in deer tissues following an accidental release from a special waste treatment center. Organohalogen Compounds, 2012. 74(2012): p. 877-880.
21.       Lambert, T. A contentious hazardous waste plant in northern Alberta is slated to close. What's next? 2024 2024-Feb-05 [cited 2024 2024-Feb-11]; Available from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/a-contentious-hazardous-waste-plant-in-northern-alberta-is-slated-to-close-what-s-next-1.7100950.
22.       Babayev, M., et al., PFAS in drinking water and serum of the people of a southeast Alaska community: A pilot study. Environ Pollut, 2022. 305: p. 119246.
23.       Environmental Working Group. PFAS contamination in the U.S. (March 24, 2025). 2025 2025/03/24 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination/.
24.       Greenpeace. Greenpeace Posts Signs in Calcasieu, Louisiana, Estuary to Warn Community of Toxic Contamination. 1999  [cited 2025 2025/03/26]; Available from: https://commonsenseforanimals.org/environment/oceans-rivers-and-estuaries/.
25.       Watson, A., et al., The map "Selected POPs waste “Hot Spots” around the World - 1 : 40 000 000". 2009, Arnika Association, IPEN, Kartografie Praha, a.s.
26.       Costner, P., Dioxin and PCB contamination in Mossville, Louisiana: A review of the exposure investigation by ASTDR. 2000.
27.       Harden, M., et al., Contamination of chicken eggs from Mossville, Louisiana, USA  by dioxins, PCBs and hexachlorobenzene, in Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs Reports. 2005, IPEN, Arnika Association, MEAN, AEHR: Mossville, Prague. p. 30.
28.       US EPA, Short-Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) and Other Chlorinated Paraffins Action Plan. 2009. p. 10.
29.       Wohlforth, C. An Alaskan's fight to ban the chemical that poisoned her childhood. 2017 2017/04/19 [cited 2025 2025/03/26]; Available from: https://www.adn.com/opinions/2017/04/19/an-alaskans-fight-to-ban-the-chemical-that-poisoned-her-childhood/.
30.       Bopp, R.F., et al., A major incident of dioxin contamination: Sediments of New Jersey estuaries. Environmental science & technology, 1991. 25(5): p. 951-956.
31.       Bock, M.J., et al., Sources of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and Other Dioxins in Lower Passaic River, New Jersey, Sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2021. 40(5): p. 1499-1519.
32.       US EPA. Case Summary: $165 Million Settlement to Start Cleanup Work on the Passaic River in New Jersey. 2016 2024/08/24 [cited 2025 2025/03/31]; Available from: https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/case-summary-165-million-settlement-start-cleanup-work-passaic-river-new-jersey.
33.       Jones, R.J., Spatial patterns of chemical contamination (metals, PAHs, PCBs, PCDDs/PCDFS) in sediments of a non-industrialized but densely populated coral atoll/small island state (Bermuda). Mar Pollut Bull, 2011. 62(6): p. 1362-76.
34.       Flores-Ramírez, R., et al., Biomonitoring of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in child populations living near contaminated sites in Mexico. Science of The Total Environment, 2017. 579: p. 1120-1126.
35.       Costilla-Salazar, R., et al., Assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls and mercury levels in soil and biological samples from San Felipe, Nuevo Mercurio, Zacatecas, Mexico. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 2011. 86(2): p. 212-6.
36.       Rodriguez-Varela, M., et al., Occurrence of perfluorinated carboxylic acids in Mexico City's wastewater: A monitoring study in the sewerage and a mega wastewater treatment plant. Sci Total Environ, 2021. 774: p. 145060.
37.       Perez-Maldonado, I.N., et al., Assessment of the polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) levels in soil samples near an electric capacitor manufacturing industry in Morelos, Mexico. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng, 2014. 49(11): p. 1244-50.
38.       de Vries, P., et al., The toxic exposure of flamingos to per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from firefighting foam applications in Bonaire. Mar Pollut Bull, 2017. 124(1): p. 102-111.
39.       Swedish EPA, Low POP Content Limit of PCDD/F in Waste. Evaluation of human health risks. 2011: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm. p. 145.
40.       Barra, R., et al., Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in eastern and western South American countries. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2006: p. 1-33.
41.       Duarte-Davidson, R., et al., Case Study 4: The ANDE Fire, Paraguay, 2015, in Chemical Health Threats: Assessing and Alerting, R. Duarte-Davidson, et al., Editors. 2018, The Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 0.
42.       UNEP, Mecanismo de Protección Civil de la Unión Apoyo técnico por el incendio de la estación eléctrica de almacenamiento de equipos con bifenilos policlorados (PCB) San Lorenzo (Paraguay Noviembre de 2015. 2015. p. 99.
43.       UNIDO. Strengthening the environmentally-sound management and final disposal of PCBs, in Paraguay. 2025 2025/01/01 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://open.unido.org/projects/PY/projects/150368.
44.       de Núñez, S.P., L. Kreitmayr, and J.A. Núñez, Descripción de casos registrados en el Centro Nacional de Toxicología (MSPyBS) por exposición debida a incendio de transformadores fuera de uso. Memorias del Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud, 2018. 16(1).
45.       Starling, M.C.V.M., et al., Occurrence and potential ecological risks of PFAS in Pampulha Lake, Brazil, a UNESCO world heritage site. Sci Total Environ, 2024. 948: p. 174586.
46.       Gomes, D.F., N. Ortiz, and S.N. Guilhen, Assessment of Pesticide Contamination in Cidade Dos Meninos, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Using Regional Screening Levels (RSL). Journal of Environmental Protection, 2023. 14(11): p. 889-902.
47.       Braga, A.M.C.B., et al., PCDD/F-contamination in a hexachlorocyclohexane waste site in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Chemosphere, 2002. 46(9): p. 1329-1333.
48.       Åberg, A., et al., Exposure assessment at a PCDD/F contaminated site in Sweden—field measurements of exposure media and blood serum analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2010. 17: p. 26-39.
49.       Demond, A., et al., Human Exposure from Dioxins in Soil. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012. 46(3): p. 1296-1302.
50.       Henriksson, S., et al., Assessment of PCDD/Fs levels in soil at a contaminated sawmill site in Sweden – A GIS and PCA approach to interpret the contamination pattern and distribution. Environmental Pollution, 2013. 180: p. 19-26.
51.       Weber, R., et al., Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites--contemporary and future relevance and challenges: overview on background, aims and scope of the series. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2008. 15(5): p. 363-93.
52.       Pless-Mulloli, T., Air, V., Schilling, B., Päpke, O. and Foster, K., Follow-up Assessment of PCDD/F in Eggs form Newcastle Allotments. 2003, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle City Council: Newcastle. p. 39.
53.       Pless-Mulloli, T., et al., Transfer of PCDD/F and heavy metals from incinerator ash on footpaths in allotments into soil and eggs. Organohalogen Compounds, 2001. 51: p. 48-52.
54.       Watson, A., Comments on the “Report on the analysis of PCDD/PCDF and Heavy Metals in Soil and Egg samples related to the Byker incinerator”. 2001.
55.       Jurgens, M.D., et al., The long shadow of our chemical past - High DDT concentrations in fish near a former agrochemicals factory in England. Chemosphere, 2016. 162: p. 333-44.
56.       Fernandez, J., M.A. Arjol, and C. Cacho, POP-contaminated sites from HCH production in Sabinanigo, Spain. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2013. 20(4): p. 1937-50.
57.       Vijgen, J., et al., HCH and lindane contaminated sites: European and global need for a permanent solution for a long-time neglected issue. Environ Pollut, 2019. 248: p. 696-705.
58.       HEAL. 3M contaminated the air, soil, and blood of people living near the chemical plant with PFOS. 2025 2025 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://www.env-health.org/banpfas/#belgium.
59.       Vlaamse overheid. PFAS in Flanders. 2022 2025/01/15 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination/.
60.       Eurofins, Grootschalig bloedonderzoek PFAS in de omgeving van de 3M-fabriek in Zwijndrecht 2023-2025. 2025.
61.       D'Hollander, W.d.V., P. Bervoets, L., Accumulation of Perfluorinated Chemicals in Belgian Home-produced Chicken Eggs. Organohalogen Compounds, 2011. 73: p. 917-920.
62.       Wilhelm, M., et al., Assessment and management of the first German case of a contamination with perfluorinated compounds (PFC) in the Region Sauerland, North Rhine-Westphalia. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 2008. 71(11-12): p. 725-33.
63.       Weber, R. and H.G. Varbelow, Dioxin/POPs legacy of pesticide production in Hamburg: part 1--securing of the production area. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2013. 20(4): p. 1918-24.
64.       Götz, R., V. Sokollek, and R. Weber, The dioxin/POPs legacy of pesticide production in Hamburg: Part 2—waste deposits and remediation of Georgswerder landfill. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013. 20(4): p. 1925-1936.
65.       Flesch-Janys, D., et al., Exposure to Polychlorinated Dioxins and Furans (PCDD/F) and Mortality in a Cohort of Workers from a Herbicide-producing Plant in Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1995. 142(11): p. 1165-1175.
66.       Carls, I., et al., Recent incident putting an international river basin under pressure-Historically high PCB-concentrations on the move, in 10th International SedNet Conference, 14-17 June 2017. 2017: Genoa, Italy.
67.       ELSA, PCB in der Elbe: Eigenschaften, Vorkommen und Trends: sowie Ursachen und Folgen der erhöhten Freisetzung im Jahr 2015. 2016.
68.       Mach, V. and J. Petrlík, Znečištění vodních toků perzistentními organickými polutanty ve vybraných zájmových oblastech. (Pollution of selected parts of the Czech rivers and creeks by persistent organic pollutants). 2016, Arnika - Toxické látky a odpady: Praha. p. 30.
69.       ČIŽP, Zpráva o sanaci PCB dle rozhodnutí ČIŽP č.j. ČIŽP/44/OOV/SR02/1509850.016/16/UHS ze dne 25.10.2016. 25-04-2017. 2017.
70.       Petrlik, J., M. Havel, and M. Skalsky, Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Czech Republic -Country Situation Report. What Was Lost on the Way to National Implementation Plan., in IPEP Reports. 2006, Arnika Association: Prague. p. 141.
71.       Kubal, M., et al., Treatment of solid waste polluted by polychlorinated contaminants (pilot-scale demonstration), in International Conference on Waste Management and the Environment No2, S. WIT Press, UK, Editor. 2004, WIT Press: Rhodes. p. 13-23.
72.       Holoubek, I.e.a., Shrnutí měření kontaminace okolí Spolany Neratovice polychlorovanými dibenzo-p-dioxiny, dibenzofurany a bifenyly po povodních 2002. 2003: Tocoen, s.r.o. Brno.
73.       Bell, L., et al., Dioxins in waste from chlor-alkali plant: A case study. Organohalogen Compounds, 2021. 82(2021): p. 163-166.
74.       Petrlik, J., et al., POPs contaminated site near Labe (Elbe) River in Pardubice, Czech Republic, in Submitted to the 45th Intenrnational Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants - Dioxin 2025. 2025: Antalya, Turkiye.
75.       Fuksa, J. and V. Kužílek, Výskyt POPs v hydrosféře ČR, in Národní inventura perzistentních organických polutantů v České republice - aktualizace, I. Holoubek, Editor. 2008. p. 15 p.
76.       Hloušková, V., Lanková, Darina, Kalachová, Kamila, Hrádková, Petra, Poustka, Jan, Hajšlová, Jana, Pulkrabová, Jana, Occurrence of brominated flame retardants and perfluoroalkyl substances in fish from the Czech aquatic ecosystem. Science of The Total Environment, 2013. 461–462(0): p. 88-98.
77.       Štěrba, O., et al., Voda živá (Living Water). 2011, Praha: Arnika - program Toxické látky a odpady.
78.       Hajšlová, J., et al., Brominated flame retardants and related chlorinated persistent organic pollutants in fish from river Elbe and its main tributary Vltava. Chemosphere, 2007. 69(8): p. 1195-1203.
79.       Gabryszewska, M. and B. Gworek, Influence of former industrial waste landfill in central Poland on PCBs content in the environment. Archives of Environmental Protection, 2023.
80.       Vernez, D., et al., Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and dibenzofurans (PCDFs) soil contamination in Lausanne, Switzerland: Combining pollution mapping and human exposure assessment for targeted risk management. Environ Pollut, 2023. 316(Pt 1): p. 120441.
81.       Pirard, C., et al., Environmental and Human Impact of an Old-Timer Incinerator in Terms of Dioxin and PCB Level: A Case Study. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005. 39(13): p. 4721-4728.
82.       Pitter, G., et al., Serum Levels of Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Adolescents and Young Adults Exposed to Contaminated Drinking Water in the Veneto Region, Italy: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on a Health Surveillance Program. Environ Health Perspect, 2020. 128(2): p. 27007.
83.       UNEP, Post-Conflict Environmental Assessment-Albania. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), SMI (Distribution Services) Limited, Stevenage, UK, 2000.
84.       Kleger, L., et al., Albania - Country Situation Report on POPs, in International POPs Elimination Project Report. 2006, Eden Center, Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme, : Tirana - Prague; available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342814386_Albania_-_Country_Situation_Report_on_POPs. p. 56.
85.       Nuro, A., B. Murtaj, and E. Marku, Levels of some organic pollutants in water samples of Adriatic Sea: Case study: Hot-spot of Porto-Romano, Albania. Zastita Materijala, 2020. 61(4): p. 306-312.
86.       Dvorska, A., et al., DDT in Eggs. A Global Review, in Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs. 2009: Prague. p. 32.
87.       Kuzmin, S. and A. Babko, Environmental impact assessment of the obsolete pesticide dumps located in the belarusian part of the Zapadnaya Dvina river basin. Slupskie prace geograficzne, 2021. 18: p. 41-53.
88.       Sazonava, V., S. Kuzmin, and A. Babko, Obsolete Pesticides (POPs) in the Republic of Belarus: Inventory, Monitoring and Environmental Impact Assessment, in 11th HCH & Pesticides Forum, 7-9 September 2011. 2011, IHPA: Gabala, Azerbaijan.
89.       Nezhyba, J., et al., Environmental sampling in Belarus (2011 -2012) Final report. 2012, Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme: Minsk - Prague. p. 108.
90.       Polák, M., J. Vaněk, and M. Černochová, Dmytrivka - Projekt průzkumných prací, in Identifikace a prioritizace ekologických zátěží v Dněpropetrovské oblasti, UA. 2024, Dekonta, Arnika. p. 16.
91.       Jelinek, N., et al., POPs at newly investigated contaminated sites in Central and Eastern Europe, in Submitted to the 45th Intenrnational Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants - Dioxin 2025. 2025: Antalya, Turkiye.
92.       Karademir, A., et al., Evaluation of PCDD/F pollution in surface sediments of Izmit Bay. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2013. 20(9): p. 6611-9.
93.       Ergul, H.A. and A. Karademir, A modeling approach on the PCDD/F pollution in surface sediments of the Izmit Bay (The Marmara Sea). Regional Studies in Marine Science, 2020. 35.
94.       Yarman, S.B., et al., Contamination of chicken eggs near the hazardous waste incinerator in Izmit, Turkey by dioxins, PCBs and hexachlorobenzene, in Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs Reports. 2005, IPEN, Arnika Association, Bumerang, Greenpeace Mediterranean: Istanbul, Prague. p. 25.
95.       Labunska, I., et al., Concentrations of heavy metals and organic contaminants in ash collected from the Izmit hazardous/clinical waste incinerator, April 2000. 2001: Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK.
96.       Cetin, S., S. Veli, and S. Ayberk, An investigation of halogens in Izmit hazardous and clinical waste incinerator. Waste Management, 2004. 24(2): p. 183-191.
97.       Giuliani, S., et al., The impact of the 1999 Mw 7.4 event in the Izmit Bay (Turkey) on anthropogenic contaminant (PCBs, PAHs and PBDEs) concentrations recorded in a deep sediment core. Sci Total Environ, 2017. 590-591: p. 799-808.
98.       Tolun, L., et al., PCB pollution of Izmit Bay (Marmara Sea) mussels after the earthquake, in Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on The Fate of Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Environment, 25–27 April 2007. 2008, Springer in cooperation with NATO Public Diplomacy Division: Istanbul, Turkey. p. 127 - 139.
99.       Revich, B. and A. Shelepchikov. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Hot Spots in Russia. in The Fate of Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Environment. 2008. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
100.      Speranskaya, O., D. Levashov, and J. Petrlik, Contamination of chicken eggs from the Dzerzhinsk region, Russia by dioxins, PCBs and hexachlorobenzene, in Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs Reports. 2005, IPEN, Arnika Association, Eco-SPES, Eco-Accord: Dzerzhinsk, Moscow, Prague. p. 30.
101.      Amirova, Z. and R. Weber, Massive PCDD/F contamination at the Khimprom organochlorine plant in Ufa - a review and recommendations for future management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015. 22(19): p. 14416-14430.
102.      Mamontova, E.A. and A.A. Mamontov, Persistent Organic Pollutants and Suspended Particulate Matter in Snow of Eastern Siberia in 2009-2023: Temporal Trends and Effects of Meteorological Factors and Recultivation Activities at Former Industrial Area. Toxics, 2023. 12(1).
103.      Mamontova, E.A., et al., Freshwater seal as a source of direct and indirect increased human exposure to persistent organic pollutants in a background area. Sci Total Environ, 2020. 715: p. 136922.
104.      Mamontova, E.A., et al., PCBs, HCHs and DDTs in cow's milk and soil of pasture from the Irkutsk Region, Russia. 2004.
105.      Mamontova, E.A., et al., Organochlorines in fish from Lake Baikal, tributaries and the Angara River, the Irkutsk Region, Russia: levels and risk assessment. Organohalogen compounds, 2006. 68: p. 1943-1946.
106.      Mamontova, E.A., et al., PCDD/Fs in human milk and blood samples from a contaminated region near Lake Baikal. Organohalogen compounds, 1999. 44: p. 37-40.
107.      Tikhonova, O.A., et al., Current Ecological State of Kozmino and Wrangel Bays (Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan). Oceanology, 2023. 62(6): p. 839-845.
108.      Grigoryeva, N.I. and D.I. Pitruk, Integral chemical-ecological state evaluation of the inlets Kozmin and Ozero Vtoroe(Nakhodka Bay, Peter the Great Bay, Japan Sea). Izvestiya Tikhookeanskogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo rybokhozyajstvennogo tsentra, 2010. 162.
109.      Mazur, M.A. and E.V. Zhuravel, Assessment of the Toxicity of Bottom Sediments from Coastal Areas of Peter the Great Gulf (Sea of Japan). Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2022. 15(6): p. 699-708.
110.      Borovkova, A.D., et al., Persistent Organic Pollutants in Bivalves from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2025. 236(3).
111.      Dvorská, A., et al., Toxic Hot Spots in Armenia. Monitoring and Sampling Reports, ed. J. Petrlík (editor). 2011, Prague - Yerevan. Available at: http://english.arnika.org/publications/toxic-hot-spots-in-armenia: Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme, Armenian Women for Health and Healthy Environment (AWHHE). 77.
112.      Dvorská, A., et al., Obsolete pesticide storage sites and their POP release into the environment—an Armenian case study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012. 19(6): p. 1944-1952.
113.      Abdullah, R. and et al., Implementation completion and results report on a loan in the amount of US$ 40.39 million to the government of Kazakhstan for the Nura River Clean-up Project. 2013: Sustainable Development Department, Kazakhstan, Country Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region.
114.      Petrlik, J., et al., Contaminated sites and their management. Case studies: Kazakhstan and Armenia. Publication of the project „Empowering the civil society in Kazakhstan in improvement of chemical safety“. 2015, Prague-Karaganda: Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme, AWHHE, CINEST, EcoMuseum,.
115.      Petrlik, J., et al., Toxic Hot Spots in Kazakhstan. Monitoring Reports. Publication of the project „Empowering the civil society in Kazakhstan in improvement of chemical safety“. 2015, Prague-Karaganda: Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme, EcoMuseum, CINEST.
116.      Arnika. Secrets of radiolocation station Daryal-U 2014 2022/04/05 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://arnika.org/en/hotspots/kazakhstan/daryal.
117.      SNC-Lavalin, W.B., Казахстан: проект по предлагаемой локализации и удалению ПХД и устаревших пестицидов. Консультационные услуги по проведению дополнительных геологических изысканий и лабораторного анализа (Kazakhstan: Proposed Contianment and Elimination of PCBs and Obsolete Pesticides Project. Consulting Services for Additional Site Investigations and Laboratory Analysis). 2011.
118.      van der Veen, H. and O. Klimanova, Terminal Evaluation (TE) Report of the project  “Design and Execution of a Comprehensive PCB Management Plan for Kazakhstan” 2015, GEF, UNDP. p. 118.
119.      Amirgaliyev, N.A., et al., Polychlorinated Biphenyls in the Snow Cover of South-Eastern Kazakhstan. Applied Sciences, 2022. 12(17).
120.      Khwaja, M.A., M.R. Jan, and K. Gul, Physical Verification and Study of Contamination in and Around an Abandoned DDT Factory in North West Frontier Province (NWFP) Pakistan, in IPEP Report. 2006, SDPI: Islamabad. p. 48.
121.      Khwaja, M.A., POPs hot spot: Soil Contamination due to a Demolished Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (Persistent Organic Pollutant) Factory, Nowshera, NWFP, Pakistan. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008. 1140: p. 113-20.
122.      Jit, S., et al., Evaluation of hexachlorocyclohexane contamination from the last lindane production plant operating in India. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2011. 18(4): p. 586-97.
123.      Jayakumar, C., et al., Contamination of chicken eggs from Eloor in Kerala, India, by dioxins, PCBs and hexachlorobenzene. Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs Report. 2005, IPEN, Arnika Association, Thanal: Kochi, Prague. p. 29.
124.      Labunska, I., et al., Toxic Hotspots: A Greenpeace Investigation of. 1999, Hindustan.
125.      Blake, A., The Next Generation of POPs: PBDEs and Lindane, in Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs Report. 2005, IPEN. p. 18.
126.      Walaska, H., et al., PBDEs and Dechlorane Plus contamination in community e-waste recycling: environmental and health implications in Northeastern Thailand. Toxicology, 2024: p. 153972.
127.      Dvorska, A., et al., Toxic hot spot in Kalasin. Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in the Surroundings of Electronic Waste Recycling Sites in Kalasin Province, Thailand. 2023: Arnika – Toxics and Waste Programme and Ecological Alert and Recovery – Thailand.
128.      Dvorska, A., et al., Environmental, Food and Human Body Burden of Dechlorane Plus in a Waste Recycling Area in Thailand: No Room for Exemptions. 2023, IPEN, Arnika, and EARTH: Gothenburg - Bangkok - Prague. p. 18.
129.      UU, Evaluation of human health risks related to the suggested 15 ppb Low POP Content Limit for PCDD/Fs. 2009, Umea University: Umea, Sweden. p. 131.
130.      Saetang, P., et al., Persistent Organic Pollutants in the Vicinity of Waste Incinerators in Phuket. 2024, Ecological Alert and Recovery Thailand (EARTH), Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme, : Bangkok - Prague.
131.      Katima, J.H.Y., et al., High levels of PCDD/Fs around sites with waste containing POPs demonstrate the need to review current standards. Organohalogen Compounds, 2018. 80: p. 700-704.
132.      Petrlik, J., Report about sampling and monitoring in the surrounding of waste incinerators in Phuket. 2011, EARTH, Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme and IPEN: Bangkok - Prague. p. 13.
133.      Jelinek, N., et al., PFASs and Waste Incineration – New Data on Residues and Free-range Chicken Eggs in Dioxin 2024 - 44th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) October, 2024. 2024: Singapore.
134.      BBC. Agent Orange: US to clean up toxic Vietnam War air base. 2019 2019/04/20 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-48000185.
135.      Wikipedia. Bien Hoa Air Base. 2021 2025/03/31 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bien_Hoa_Air_Base.
136.      Schecter, A., et al., Recent dioxin contamination from Agent Orange in residents of a southern Vietnam city. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2001. 43(5): p. 435-443.
137.      Schecter, A., et al., A Follow-Up: High Level of Dioxin Contamination in Vietnamese From Agent Orange, Three Decades After the End of Spraying. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2002. 44(3).
138.      Schecter, A., et al., Food as a source of dioxin exposure in the residents of Bien Hoa City, Vietnam. J Occup Environ Med, 2003. 45(8): p. 781-8.
139.      Kudryavtseva, A.D., A.A. Shelepchikov, and E.S. Brodsky, Free-range chicken eggs as a bioindicator of dioxin contamination in Vietnam, including long-term Agent Orange impact. Emerging Contaminants, 2020. 6: p. 114-123.
140.      Petrlik, J., et al., Monitoring Dioxins and PCBs in Eggs as Sensitive Indicators for Environmental Pollution and Global Contaminated Sites and Recommendations for Reducing and Controlling Releases and Exposure. Emerging Contaminants, 2022. 8(2022): p. 254-279.
141.      Minh, N.H., et al., Environmental assessment of dioxin contamination in newly suspected Agent Orange site in Bien Hoa Airbase. Organohalogen Compound, 2013. 75: p. 1335-1338.
142.      Barry-Jester, A.M. and B. Murphy. Trump Halted an Agent Orange Cleanup. That Puts Hundreds of Thousands at Risk for Poisoning. 2025 2025/03/17 [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-halted-agent-orange-cleanup-dioxin-vietnam-poison-risk.
143.      Bell, L., NON-Combustion Technology for POPs waste destruction: Replacing incineration with clean technology. 2020: Gothenburg - Perth. p. 57.
144.      McDowall, I.R., Dioxin Remediation Technologies. 2010, UNDP Vietnam. p. 37.
145.      HigherGow. Search Awardees: Nelson Environmental Remediation Usa. 2025  [cited 2025 2025/03/30]; Available from: https://www.highergov.com/awardee/nelson-environmental-remediation-usa-ltd-12236498/.
146.      Hu, J., et al., Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) in Water Environment of Singapore. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2010. 216(1-4): p. 179-191.
147.      Petrlik, J., et al., Toxic Hot Spots in Java and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Eggs. 2020, Jakarta - Gresik - Gothenburg - Prague: IPEN, Arnika - Toxics and Waste Programme, Nexus3, Ecoton.
148.      Paddock, R.C., To Make This Tofu, Start by Burning Toxic Plastic, in New York Times. 2019.
149.      Ismawati, Y., et al., Dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and dioxin-like PCBs (dl-PCBs) in free-ranged chicken eggs from toxic hotspots of Java. Organohalog Compd, 2021. 82(2021): p. 21-24.
150.      Ismawati, Y., et al., POPs in free-range chicken eggs from Indonesia, in Dioxin 2024 - 44th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) October, 2024. 2024: Singapore. p. 205-210.
151.      Joerss, H., et al., Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in Chinese and German river water - Point source- and country-specific fingerprints including unknown precursors. Environ Pollut, 2020. 267: p. 115567.
152.      Li, Y., et al., Concentrations and distribution of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in soils and plants from a deca-BDE manufacturing factory in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2015. 22(2): p. 1133-43.
153.      Chen, Y., J. Li, and Q. Tan, Trends of production, consumption and environmental emissions of Decabromodiphenyl ether in mainland China. Environmental Pollution, 2020. 260.
154.      UNEP and BAT/BEP Expert Group, Guidance on best available te chniques and best environmental practices relevant to the polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and Dechlorane Plus (DP) listed under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. Updated July 2024. Available at https://www.pops.int/Implementation/BATandBEP/JointToolkitandexpertroster/Guidanceunderreview/ReleasesfromintentionalPOPs/tabid/10054/Default.aspx. 2024: Geneva. p. 114.
155.      Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China, List of New Pollutants for Priority Control (Final Version 2023). 2023.
156.      Jiang, Y., et al., Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the environment and human external and internal exposure in China: A review. Sci Total Environ, 2019. 696: p. 133902.
157.      Li, N., et al., Occurrence and distribution characteristics of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) from a closed deca-BDE manufacturing factory in Jiangsu province, China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2018. 18(5): p. 1950-1957.
158.      Zhou, L., et al., Tree bark as a biomonitor for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers from Southern Jiangsu, China: levels, distribution, and possible sources. Environ Monit Assess, 2015. 187(9): p. 603.
159.      Zhang, Y., et al., The Spatial Distribution and Potential Risk Assessment of POPs in Farmland around a Typical E-Waste Dismantling Site. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2023. 84(4): p. 453-465.
160.      Zhou, S., et al., Spatial distribution and implications to sources of halogenated flame retardants in riverine sediments of Taizhou, an intense e-waste recycling area in eastern China. Chemosphere, 2017. 184: p. 1202-1208.
161.      Labunska, I., et al., Human Dietary Exposure to PBDEs Around E-Waste Recycling Sites in Eastern China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014. 48(10): p. 5555-5564.
162.      Zhao, Y., et al., Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in aborted human fetuses and placental transfer during the first trimester of pregnancy. Environ Sci Technol, 2013. 47(11): p. 5939-46.
163.      Lin, A.Y., S.C. Panchangam, and P.S. Ciou, High levels of perfluorochemicals in Taiwan's wastewater treatment plants and downstream rivers pose great risk to local aquatic ecosystems. Chemosphere, 2010. 80(10): p. 1167-74.
164.      Weber, R., Tysklind, M., Gaus C., Dioxin – Contemporary and Future Challenges of Historical Legacies (Editorial, dedicated to Otto Hutzinger). Env Sci Pollut Res, 2008. 15(2): p. 96-100.
165.      Labunska, I., et al., Heavy metals and organic contaminants in the vicinity of the Teshima Island illegal dumpsite, Kagawa Prefecture, Japan, in Greenpeace Research Laboratories Technical Note. 2000, Greenpeace Research Laboratories, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK. p. 58.
166.      Lein, N.P.H., et al., Contamination of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in surface water of the Yodo River basin (Japan). Desalination, 2008. 226(1-3): p. 338-347.
167.      Diouf, H.R., et al., Contamination of chicken eggs near the Mbeubeuss dumpsite in a suburb of Dakar, Senegal by dioxins, PCBs and hexachlorobenzene. Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs Reports, 2005: p. 29.
168.      Mbodji, M., et al., Investigating the metal contamination status from recycling e-waste sites from Dakar, Senegal. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2022. 29(18): p. 26285-26296.
169.      Petrlik, J., et al., Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Eggs: Report from Africa. 2019: p. 48.
170.      Jelinek, N., et al., Dioxin and Other POPs Contamination Related to Small Medical Waste Incinerators, in Dioxin 2023 - 43rd International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) September 10-14, 2023. 2023: Maastricht, The Netherlands.
171.      Tue, N.M., et al., Release of chlorinated, brominated and mixed halogenated dioxin-related compounds to soils from open burning of e-waste in Agbogbloshie (Accra, Ghana). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016. 302(Supplement C): p. 151-157.
172.      Tue, N.M., et al., Complex Mixtures of Brominated/Chlorinated Diphenyl Ethers and Dibenzofurans in Soils from the Agbogbloshie e-Waste Site (Ghana): Occurrence, Formation, and Exposure Implications. Environ Sci Technol, 2019.
173.      Akortia, E., et al., Soil concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and trace metals from an electronic waste dump site in the Greater Accra Region, Ghana: Implications for human exposure. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2017. 137: p. 247-255.
174.      Eze, C.T., et al., West African e-waste-soil assessed with a battery of cell-based bioassays. Sci Total Environ, 2023. 856(Pt 1): p. 159068.
175.      Hogarh, J.N., et al., Persistent organic pollutants in free-range chicken eggs in Ghana. Organohalogen Compounds, 2019. 81(2019): p. 507-510.
176.      Mansur, I. and J. Nasiru. How Nigeria’s unchecked e-waste is poisoning residents, environment. 2024 2024/12/02 [cited 2025 2025/03/31]; Available from: https://www.iwmf.org/reporting/living-on-borrowed-time-i-how-nigerias-unchecked-e-waste-is-poisoning-residents-environment/.
177.      Babayemi, J.O., et al., Initial Inventory of Plastics Imports in Nigeria as a Basis for More Sustainable Management Policies. Journal of Health and Pollution, 2018: p. 1-15.
178.      Sindiku, O., et al., Polybrominated diphenyl ethers listed as Stockholm Convention POPs, other brominated flame retardants and heavy metals in e-waste polymers in Nigeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015. 22(19): p. 14489-14501.
179.      Babayemi, J., et al., Substance flow analysis of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in plastic from EEE/WEEE in Nigeria in the frame of Stockholm Convention as a basis for policy advice. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015. 22: p. 14502–14514.
180.      Sindiku, O., et al., Polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PBDD/Fs) in e-waste plastic in Nigeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015. 22(19): p. 14515-14529.
181.      Mochungong, P.I., G. Gulis, and M. Sodemann, Clinical waste incinerators in Cameroon--a case study. Int J Health Care Qual Assur, 2012. 25(1): p. 6-18.
182.      Petrlik, J., et al., Hazardous Chemicals in Plastic Products and Food Chain in Kenya. 2023.
183.      Ochieng Ochola, G., et al., POPs in Plastic Products and Chicken Eggs from Kenya in the Light of the Basel and Stockholm Conventions, in Dioxin 2023 - 43rd International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) September 10-14, 2023. 2023: Maastricht, The Netherlands.
184.      Mng’anya, S., et al., Contamination of chicken eggs near the Vikuge obsolete pesticides stockpile in Tanzania by dioxins, PCBs and hexachlorobenzene, in Keep the Promise, Eliminate POPs Reports. 2005, IPEN, Arnika Association, Agenda: Dar-es-Salam, Prague. p. 35.
185.      Quinn, L., et al. Levels and Implications of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Other Contaminants in South Africa. Results from the" LIPOPSA" Project. in International Dioxin Symposium. 2011.
186.      Nieuwoudt, C., et al., Dioxin-like chemicals in soil and sediment from residential and industrial areas in central South Africa. Chemosphere, 2009. 76(6): p. 774-83.
187.      Fauconier, G., et al., Perfluorinated compounds in the aquatic food chains of two subtropical estuaries. Sci Total Environ, 2020. 719: p. 135047.
188.      Ackerman Grunfeld, D., et al., Underestimated burden of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in global surface waters and groundwaters. Nature Geoscience, 2024. 17(4): p. 340-346.
189.      Birch, G.F., et al., The source and distribution of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and polychlorinated dibenzofurans in sediments of Port Jackson, Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2007. 54(3): p. 295-308.
190.      Gifford, J.S., et al., Pentachlorophenol (PCP) in the New Zealand environment: Assessment near contaminated sites and remote freshwater lakes. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 1995. 48(1-2): p. 69-82.
191.      Palmer, T.A., et al., Long-term changes in contamination and macrobenthic communities adjacent to McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Sci Total Environ, 2021. 764: p. 142798.
192.      Palmer, T.A., et al., Using epibenthic fauna as biomonitors of local marine contamination adjacent to McMurdo Station, Antarctica. Mar Pollut Bull, 2022. 178: p. 113621.
193.      Vogt, T., et al., Biological toxicity estimates show involvement of a wider range of toxic compounds in sediments from Durban, South Africa than indicated from instrumental analyses. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2019. 138: p. 49-57.
194.      European Commission, Commission Regulation (EU) No 589/2014 of 2 June 2014 laying down methods of sampling and analysis for the control of levels of dioxins, dioxin-like PCBs and non-dioxin-like PCBs in certain foodstuffs and repealing Regulation (EU) No 252/2012 (Text with EEA relevance), European Commission, Editor. 2014: Official Journal of the European Union. p. 18-40.